
Katie Nixon, CFA, CPWA®, CIMA®
Chief Investment Officer, Northern Trust Wealth Management
U.S. stocks continued their downward slide this week, leading the S&P 500 index officially into correction territory. The S&P peaked in mid-February at 6,144 and closed at 5,521 on Thursday March 13, slightly exceeding the 10% decline from peak levels that defines a market correction. Should investors be concerned about the U.S. economy or about the inflationary effects of tariffs? And are there signs that this week’s correction may be winding down? We discuss answers to these questions and more in this Weekly Five.
What growth challenges have surfaced year-to-date, and are you concerned about a recession in the U.S. later this year?
In line with consensus forecasts, we have lowered our growth expectations for GDP this year, reflecting some notable developments over the past few weeks. First, it is more apparent today that the Trump administration will likely enact more sizable tariffs than previously expected, with some estimating that the average tariff rate may rise from an average of roughly 2% to as high as 10%. Tariffs act as a tax and a growth headwind. Second, there is an increased emphasis on cost savings through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which acts effectively as fiscal tightening, creating an additional growth headwind. Third, the overall sense of uncertainty is increasingly being reflected in falling business confidence, as both large and small businesses have put plans to hire and invest on hold pending more clarity on policy. The longer the uncertainty prevails, the more likely it is that weaker sentiment will translate into reduced activity — yet another growth headwind. And last, we are starting to see signs of a growth slowdown in the economic data, with growth trending to below 2%, which is slightly less than potential.
Although the first half of 2025 may prove challenging from a growth perspective, given the high levels of uncertainty we noted and a seemingly higher tolerance in Washington for a growth air-pocket, we maintain that the U.S. will avoid a recession this year.
Will the proposed tariffs be inflationary, and will they derail the Fed from continuing its easing cycle later this year?
The unfortunate answer to that question is "it’s complicated." Tariffs are taxes on imported goods and can directly increase the costs for households and businesses that consume them. The magnitude of price increases depends on several factors, including whether the businesses importing goods intend to fully pass on tariff-related price increases to consumers or choose to absorb them by decreasing their own profit margins. It also depends on the reactions of the exporter. For example, will they lower the price of goods to partially offset the tariff impact and prevent prices in the U.S. from rising to uncompetitive levels. And foreign exchange also plays a role: If the U.S. dollar strengthens, it can offset some of the inflationary impact. In addition, tariffs can reduce the availability of imports and could potentially disrupt supply chains, which can create inflation as consumers are forced to pay higher prices and/or pursue less optimal substitutes.
All that said, tariffs represent a one-time price increase, and they should not, absent other factors, create more durable inflation over time. In light of the tariff threats this year and the likely retaliation, we have increased our outlook for inflation slightly, although we still anticipate that inflation trends will be favorable overall and that disinflationary progress will be enough to enable the Fed to resume the rate cutting cycle sometime in mid-2025.
The Weekly Five
Put recent portfolio performance in context with market and economic analysis that goes beyond the headlines.
How do you read current market sentiment, and are there any signs that this correction phase may be ending?
Market timing is perilous, and there are compelling arguments for bears and bulls right now. On the one hand, the bears are highlighting the policy uncertainty and potential adverse outcomes associated with a global trade war. On the other, the (few) bulls are highlighting the prospect of better times ahead in the second half of the year, when many of the pro-growth policies of the Trump administration will be revealed — the bulls consider the recent selloff an overreaction.
Market bottoms are crystal clear in the rearview mirror, of course, but there are some interesting datasets to consider as we think through how far this current market correction has gone and what the near future may hold. For one, investor sentiment looks extremely washed out at this point. The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sentiment survey asks individuals their thoughts on where the market is headed in the next six months. The recent survey results revealed a very bearish outlook — nearly 60% of respondents were outright bearish, and less than 20% were bullish. This is close to a bearish high-water mark in a survey that goes back to 1987. We note that other periods of extreme bearishness are more often associated with market bottoms.
We can also look at the equity put/call ratio, which is another gauge of market sentiment. It measures the trading volume of put options for equities relative to that of call options for equities. For background, consider that put options offer buyers the right to sell the market index at a specified price, and they typically represent a point of view that the value of the index will fall. In contrast, call options give the buyer the right to buy a specific index at a certain pre-determined price and are often associated with a bullish outlook. A higher put/call ratio represents greater bearishness, and with the current ratio of 0.94, we can say unequivocally that investors are very bearish indeed. Historically, this reading represents a true spike and is an outlier against a more typical reading of 0.50. We note, again, that such spikes are more often associated with market bottoms, but we seek to stay the course and avoid letting market sentiment dictate our policy. We accept market volatility and believe that uncertainty is a price worth paying for the benefits of owning equities over the long term.
Has your fundamental outlook for corporate earnings changed?
According to FactSet, analysts have revised Q1 2025 S&P 500 earnings estimates downward from 11.6% at the start of the year to 7.3% currently, with revisions hitting all 11 sectors of the index. Not surprisingly, the most acute cuts have been in Materials, Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Consumer Staples — the sectors that are most exposed to changes in trade policy. These four sectors also had the highest percentage of companies citing the word "tariff" in their Q4 earnings calls.
Despite reduced expectations for Q1 earnings, analysts remain optimistic for the remainder of the year and anticipate full-year earnings growth to be roughly 11.6%. With full-year estimates barely changed, most of the market downturn we have experienced this year has come from valuation contraction, with the S&P 500 price-to-forward earnings ratio sitting at 20.1 — still elevated in historical terms, but below the over 22 level at the beginning of the year. We do think earnings estimates may be vulnerable to further downgrades if the policy related uncertainties continue, and this may begin to bleed through to corporate and consumer activity. That said, we know from experience that the U.S. companies we invest in have proved to be remarkably resilient, extremely agile, and are entering into this period with very strong balance sheets. As such, we remain constructive on U.S. equities.
Can you comment on the efficacy of diversification in today’s market environment?
While our attention is drawn to the red on our screens and to the negative returns across U.S. equity markets, it is important to recognize what is working well in 2025: Diversification. Often called the last "free lunch" on Wall Street, diversification has gotten a bit of a bad name over the past several years as bonds failed to play their traditional role as portfolio ballast, and as U.S. large caps — particularly large-cap technology and AI stocks — continued to roundly beat non-U.S. investments. This year, however, the tide has turned: Bonds are playing their traditional role in portfolios as diversifiers and risk mitigators, and the returns across high-quality corporate and municipal bonds are positive year-to-date. Next, while the U.S. market continues to face downward pressure, developed ex-U.S. markets and emerging markets have posted positive returns, and this only underscores our view on the importance of maintaining global diversification. And last, investments in global infrastructure and in equity-based natural resources have also provided positive returns and a port in this U.S.-equity storm.